Eurasian Economic Solidarity: Justification from the Standpoint of Judicial Practice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2023-03-101-108

Keywords:

solidarity, court, integration, publicity, constitution, identity, disputes

Abstract

Aim. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the concept of Eurasian economic solidarity in the context of the practice of the court of the Eurasian Economic Union.Tasks. The objectives of the study are: highlighting the sign of publicity in the context of economic integration; analysis of existing scientific and normative approaches to solidarity; substantiation of Eurasian economic solidarity as a principle and value of economic interaction, formed, inter alia, through judicial practice.Methods. The following methods were used: institutional analysis, comparative analysis, system analysis - to substantiate the sign of publicity in the context of economic integration, to characterize the Eurasian economic solidarity as a principle and value of economic interaction within the framework of the common economic space of the EAEU, to highlight the practice of the EAEU court as a factor in the formation of the Eurasian economic solidarity. The method of formal-logical analysis was also used - in clarifying the concepts of “solidarity” and “economic solidarity”.Results. Firstly, the activity of the EAEU Court reflects international or integration normative control, which is an integral part of public control and supervision in the conditions of integration. In the context of economic integration, the sign of “publicity” in relation to control and supervision as basic management functions is naturally supplemented by an integration level. Secondly, the supranational bodies of the EAEU, including the Court of the EAEU, are able to form and ensure economic solidarity in the context of Eurasian integration. Thirdly, Eurasian economic solidarity is seen as the principle and value of economic interaction within the framework of a single economic territory.Conclusions. Eurasian economic solidarity is based on economic unity, but is not conditioned by it. It is formed in the processes of integration rule-making and law enforcement. Eurasian economic solidarity is closely connected with other types of solidarity: ethnic, social, etc. Dispute resolution and interpretation by the EAEU Court act as a means of forming common economic positions within the EAEU. The EAEU Court has a sufficient and not fully realized potential to influence the development of Eurasian integration, including by stimulating the development of Eurasian economic solidarity. Equal access of economic entities of the EAEU member states to justice for the protection of economic rights is a condition for Eurasian economic solidarity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • S.A. Agamagomedova, Institute of State and Law of The Russian Academy of Sciences

    Saniyat A. Agamagomedova, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher of the Sector of Administrative Law and Administrative Process, PhD in Jurisprudence, Associate Professor

    Moscow

References

Агамагомедова С. А. Защита интересов бизнеса в условиях интеграции: практика Суда Евразийского экономического союза // Право и экономика. 2021. № 10 (404). С. 12–19. EDN: OMEETK

Брындин Е. Г. Международная экономическая солидарность // Репутациология. 2012. № 1–2 (17– 18). С. 22–24. EDN: OWDEQZ

Капустин А. Я. Международное судебное толкование международного договора: современные тренды // Журнал российского права. 2021. Т. 25. № 8. С. 104–117. DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2021.102; EDN: SSFQYQ

Капустин А. Я., Ковлер А. И., Белялова А. М. [и др.] Практика рассмотрения межгосударственных жалоб в международных судах: история вопроса и перспективы // Журнал зарубежного законодательства и сравнительного правоведения. 2020. № 6. С. 116–134. DOI: 10.12737/jflcl.2020.056; EDN: CSYFPD

Нешатаева Т. Н. Наднационализм: развитие внутреннего права ЕАЭС // Российское правосудие. 2019. № 5. С. 38–57. DOI: 10.17238/issn2072-909X.2019.5.38-57; EDN: WBGVCZ

Нешатаева Т. Н. Независимость и добросовестность суда и судей в цифровую эпоху: интеграционный опыт // Вестник Пермского университета. Юридические науки. 2022. № 55. C. 107–126. DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2022-55-107-126; EDN: GGVIFW

Нешатаева Т. Н. Слышать жизнь: действие актов международного суда в национальных правовых системах // Российское правосудие. 2018. № 1. С. 46–62. EDN: YVJMDB

Ориу М. Основы публичного права. Перевод с франц. М. : Издательство Коммунистической академии, 1929. 759 c.

Хопёрская Л. Л., Голованов Р. С. Евразийская стратегия межэтнического согласия (на материалах государств Центральной Азии и Юга России) // Государственное и муниципальное управление. Ученые записки. 2020. № 1. С. 172–178. DOI: 10.22394/2079-1690-2020-1-1-172-178; EDN: HFDHBS

Шлыкова Н. Б., Грачев Д. О., Чиркин В. Е. [и др.] Конституции государств Азии / под ред. Т. Я. Хабриевой. Т. 1: Западная Азия. М. : Юридическое издательство «Норма», 2010. 544 с. EDN: QLYXFZ

Ястребов О. А. Юридическое лицо публичного права: сравнительно-правовое исследование: автореф. дисс. … докт. юрид. наук. Москва, 2010. 50 c. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://viewer.rsl.ru/ru/rsl01004604255?page=2&rotate=0&theme=white (дата обращения: 06.07.2023).

Bauhr M., Charron N. Stand Together or Alone? Public Support for European Economic Solidarity during the Covid-19 Pandemic // European Societies. 2021. Vol. 23. Issue 4. P. 533–561. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2021.1922931

Heffernan T. Crisis and Belonging: Protest Voices and Empathic Solidarity in Post-Economic Collapse Iceland // Religions. 2022. Vol. 11. Issue 1. Article Number 22. DOI: 10.3390/rel11010022

Karagiannis N. Solidarity within Europe / Solidarity without Europe // European Societies. 2007. Vol. 9. Issue 1. P. 3–21. DOI: 10.1080/14616690601079416

Scipes K. Global Labor Solidarity // Working USA — the Journal of Labor and Society. 2014. Vol. 17. Issue 2. P. 141–144. DOI: 10.1111/wusa.12103

Downloads

Published

2023-05-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Agamagomedova S. Eurasian Economic Solidarity: Justification from the Standpoint of Judicial Practice // Eurasian Integration. 2023. Vol. 17, no. 3. P. 101–108. https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2023-03-101-108

Коды статьи

  • EDN PRGXQG
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)