Technological Restructuring of Economies of the Former Soviet Union: from “Destruction” to “Creation”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2023-02-24-33Keywords:
desintegration, technological sovereignty, "dutch disease", convergence, economic identityAbstract
Modern geo-economic and geopolitical processes create a need to rethink the integration interaction between the republics of the former USSR, now - sovereign countries. This is due not only to the rapidly increasing instability of the global financial system, the growth of trade and economic contradictions between countries, but also to the possibility of using the previous experience of inter-republican industrial-technological and intellectual cooperation to achieve the goals of economic development.Aim and tasks. The article’s main aim is to frame the technological and economic interaction between the former republics of the USSR in the new geo-economic and geopolitical conditions.Methods. The methods applied includes empirical and statistical analysis, the use of consistency, the principles of scientific discussion, dialectical methods of cognition, such as the unity of the historical and logical, the principles of induction and deduction, the principle of the linkage between qualitative and quantitative characteristics, the unity of analysis and synthesis.Results. The article highlights the features of the trajectory of the economic development of the former Soviet republics. The main problems associated with the transition to a “free market economy”, such as declining economies, population decrease, significant external debt, “Dutch disease” and deindustrialization of the economy, are identified.Conclusion. In conclusion the need to develop a new economic policy in the countries of the former USSR is argued from the standpoint of increased instability in the external economic environment and the need to strengthen their national economies, but also by the loss of economic independence and the accumulation of problems during the period of building a “market economy”. Significant efforts are required to restore the economy of the former republics of the USSR. The strategic direction is the reindustrialization of the economy, that is, the restoration of the lost economic potential on a new industrial and technological basis. For the successful implementation of the goal of strengthening economic sovereignty, it is of great importance to unite the scientific, intellectual and educational potential of the former republics of the USSR and create a common technological space. This will inevita bly lead to the formation o f a new system of international division of labor in the post-Soviet space, which is the main feature of a market economy.Agencies
Исследование проведено в рамках проекта «Интеграционные процессы СНГ: проблемы, возможности и перспективы», финансируемого по программе инициативных научно-исследовательских работ СЗИУ РАНХиГС.Downloads
References
Бойко И. В., Коновалова Т. А. Экономический потенциал ЕАЭС : учебник. СПб. : ИПЦ СЗИУ РАНХиГС, 2020. 244 c.
Долженков А., Ивантер А., Калянина Л. [и др.] Узбекистан: от хлопка к автопрому [Электронный ресурс] // Эксперт. 26.09.2022. URL: https://expert.ru/expert/2022/39/uzbekistan-ot-khlopka-k-atompromu/ (дата обращения: 22.02.2023).
Ершов Ю. С. Экономика постсоветского пространства: ожидавшееся и неожиданное // Всероссийский экономический журнал ЭКО. 2016. Т. 46. № 10. С. 23–44. https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2016-10-23-44
Либман А. Постсоветская интеграция и политические системы постсоветских государств [Электронный ресурс] // Россия и новые государства Евразии. 2012. № 4. С. 5–20. URL: https://www.imemo.ru/files/File/magazines/rossia_i_novay/2012_04/ALIB_postsoviet.pdf (дата обращения: 22.02.2023).
Тренин Д. Россия и страны СНГ: «взросление» отношений. 20 лет спустя. Как изменился мир после распада СССР // Эволюция постсоветского пространства: прошлое, настоящее, будущее. НП РСМД. Москва. 2017. 384 с. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.imemo.ru/files/File/magazines/rossia_i_novay/2018_03/Ryabov_Post_sovetskoye.pdf (дата обращения: 22.02.2023).
Akhmedova A. T. Innovative Strategic System Management of the Enterprise // Academic Journal of Digital Economics and Stability. 2021. V. 10. P. 52–55. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://economics.academicjournal.io/index.php/economics/article/view/344 (дата обращения: 22.02.2023).
Aliyeva A. Post-Oil Period in Azerbaijan: Economic Transformations, Anti-Inflation Policy and Innovations Management // Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2022. No. 2. P. 268–283. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.2-24
Anderson K., Capannelli G., Ginti ng E. [и др.] Kazakhstan: Accelerating Economic Diversification. Series: Country Diagnostic Studies. Asian Development Bank. 2018. 232 p.
Gronwald M., Mayr J., Orazbayev S. Estimating the Effects of Oil Price Shocks on the Kazakh Economy [Электронный ресурс] // Ifo Working Paper. № 81. October. 2009. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46464075_Estimating_the_effects_of_oil_price_shocks_on_the_Kazakh_economy/figures?lo=1&utm_source=google&utm_medium=organic (дата обращения: 22.02.2023).
Mukhammedova Z. M. Trends in the Dynamics of Structural Changes in Uzbekistan [Электронный ресурс] // Academic Journal of Digital Economics and Stability. 2022. V. 13. P. 109–112. URL: https://economics.academicjournal.io/index.php/economics/article/view/404/390 (дата обращения: 22.01.2023).
Reingand N., Sugirbekov N. Diversifying Kazakhstan’s Economy: From Oil Dependency to Competitive Industrial, Innovative Development [Электронный ресурс] // Russian International Affairs Coincil. February 11, 2020. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/en/analytics-and-comments/analytics/diversifying-kazakhstan-s-economy-from-oildependency-to-competitive-industrial-innovative-developme/ (дата обращения: 16.01.2023).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Boiko I.V.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN IORFUG
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)