Comparative Analysis of Modern Concepts of Information Warfare
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2022-04-139-148Keywords:
information and psychological warfare, information War, network war, network-centric war, mental warfareAbstract
This study is devoted to the comparative analysis of the subject fields of the main modern concepts of information and psychological warfare.Aim. To identify the features of the subject fields of the main modern concepts of information and psychological warfare.Tasks. To analyze the main modern concepts of information and psychological warfare: information war, network war, network-centric war, mental warfare; determine their essential characteristics and identify the features of subject fields.Methods. During the research, both general scientific (analysis, synthesis, analogy) and special methods were by the authors in order to solve scientific problems: content analysis, comparative analysis, critical discourse analysis.Results. The study showed that the term “information warfare” has appeared in a report commissioned by the US Department of Defense. Further, this concept was actively operated by American military experts involved in the development and planning of various types of military operations. The attitude to this term in scientific circles is ambiguous. In the scientific literature, one can find a large number of definitions explaining this phenomenon, which indicates the ongoing discussions in the scientific world about the sense of the “information war” as the phenomena.Often this term is replaced by the term “information and psychological warfare”, which should be understood as such a relationship between states in which one of the opposing parties, in order to expand its zone of influence and eliminate potential competitors, resorts to active covert influence on the information sphere of its opponent, aimed at creating conditions for making favorable decisions for one or the other state in military, political, economic and other fields.Conclusions. The authors come to the conclusion that the theory of information warfare should be considered as an area of scientific research aimed at understanding the use of advanced technologies in interstate confrontation which causes fundamental changes in the forms, principles and means of conflicts in the information age. Currently, the theory of information warfare has been differentiated and developed in a number of original concepts that focus on various aspects of confrontation in the information environment and the use of ICT in military confrontation.Downloads
References
Бартош А. А., Кефели И. Ф. Фактор информационного противоборства в политике коллективного Запада // Проблемы национальной стратегии. 2022. № 4 (73). С. 283-302. DOI: 10.52311/2079-3359_2022_4_283
Выходец Р. С. "Информационные доминанты" как инструмент информационно-психологических войн // Общественные науки и современность. 2022. № 4. С. 93-104. DOI: 10.31857/S0869049922040074
Глазьев С. Ю., Кефели И. Ф. К вопросу об идеологии Евразийского экономического союза // Евразийская интеграция: экономика, право, политика. 2022. Т. 16. № 1. С. 10-21. DOI: 10.22394/2073-29292022-01-10-21
Ильницкий А. М. Безопасность страны как фундамент развития // Арсенал Отечества. 2021. № 1 (51).
Ильницкий А. М. Ментальная война // Военная мысль. 2021. № 8. С. 19-33.
Ильницкий А. М. Стратегия ментальной безопасности России // Военная мысль. 2022. № 4. С. 24-35.
Капто А. С. Кибервойна: генезис и доктринальные очертания // Вестник Российской Академии наук. 2013. Т. 83. № 7. С. 616-625. DOI: 10.7868/S0869587313070050
Кефели И. Ф. Асфатроника: на пути к теории глобальной безопасности. СПб., 2020. 228 с.
Манойло А. В. "Фейковые новости" как угроза национальной безопасности и инструмент информационного управления // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 12. Политические науки. 2019. № 2. С. 37-45.
Манойло А. В. Информационные войны и психологические операции. Руководство к действию. М.: Горячая линия - Телеком, 2018. 496 с.
Arquilla J., Ronfeldt D. In Athena's Camp. Preparing for Conflict in the Information Age. 1997. RAND Corporation. 525 p.
Arquilla J., Ronfeldt D. The Advent of Netwar. 1996. RAND Corporation. 127 p.
Bernal A., Carter C., Singh I.. Cognitive Warfare. John Hopkins University. 2020. 45 p.
Cebrowski A., Garstka J. Network-Cenrtic Warfare - Its Origin and Future// Proccedings. 1998. Vol. 124. URL: https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1998/january/network-centric-warfare-its-origin-and-future (дата обращения: 23.10.2022).
Clarke R. Cyber War: The Next Threat to National Security and What to Do About It. 2011. Ecco. 320 p.
Cluzel F. Cognitive Warfare. Innovation Hub. 2020. 45 p.
Green S. Cognitive Warfare. The Augean Stables. Joint Military Intelligence College. July 2008. URL: www.theaugeanstables.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Green-Cognitive-Warfare.pdf (дата обращения: 29.10.2022).
Linebarger P. Psychological Warfare. Washington, 1954. 335 p. (рус. перев. П. Лайнбарджер. Психологическая война. М., Воениздат. 1962 г. 352 с.).
Owens W., Offley E. Lifting the Fog of War. 2001. Johns Hopkins University Press. 296 p.
Rona T. Weapon Systems and Information War. Boeing Aerospace Co., Seattle, WA, 1976. 50 p.
Toffler A., Toffler H. War and Anti War. Grand Central Publishing. 1995. 370 p.
Vykhodets R. S., Shlyapnilov V. V. The Role of Big Brain Science in the Development of Artificial Intelligence Technologies // Archivos Venezolanos De Farmacología Y Terapéutica. 2022. Vol. 41. No. 2. P. 79-84. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6571103
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN SVTUJU
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)