On the Issue of the Strategy for the Formation of the Trans-regional Integration Contour of the EAEU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2022-04-26-42Keywords:
international relations, integration, mutual trade, consolidation, Eurasian Economic Union (EEU), transregional integration, regional trade agreements, EEU strategyAbstract
The instability and uncertainty of international relations accentuate the role of new and inclusive platforms of interaction and cooperation. Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) alongside its regional and transregional partners represent an example of such a platform based on new principles and values, an element of international relation configuration.Aim. Assess the prospects for a zone (cluster) within the planned and potential transregional EEU’s expansion beyond the CIS borders.Task. To evaluate the dynamics of the consolidation concerning, first, current free trade EEU agreements (FTAs or the EEU FTAs) with Serbia, Iran, Vietnam and Singapore, second, potential agreements with listed in the EEU official strategy, third, other developing states with relevant economic and/or demographic potential.Methods. The authors use additional consolidation (share of intra-bloc trade) as a metric. It is calculated as the difference between the share of EEU intra-trade and within the existing or potential EEU FTA partnerships.Results. Based on the assessment of additional consolidation, the research revealed that the existing EEU FTAs with Iran and Vietnam are effective, while trade integration with Serbia, Singapore and China are ineffective. The presence of additional consolidation was revealed for Turkey, Egypt, and Bangladesh.Conclusions. The implementation of the transregional integration track is an important development step for the Eurasian Economic Union. However, trade partnerships have different trade efficiency.Downloads
References
Белащенко Д. А., Толкачев В. В., Шоджонов И. Ф. Евразийский экономический союз: перспективы и проблемы интеграции на постсоветском пространстве // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Международные отношения. 2020. Т. 20. № 3. С. 543-559. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2020-20-3-543-559
Бордачев Т. В., Вишневский К. О., Глазатова М. К. и др. Евразийская экономическая интеграция: перспективы развития и стратегические задачи для России: докл. к XX Апр. междунар. науч. конф. по проблемам развития экономики и общества. Москва, 9-12 апр. 2019 г. / отв. ред. Т. А. Мешкова. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики. 2019. 123 c.
Глазьев С. Ю. Рывок в будущее. Россия в новых технологическом и мирохозяйственном укладах. М.: Книжный мир. 2019. 327 с.
Горбунова М. Л., Ливанова Е. Ю., Комаров И. Д. Перспективы формирования общего евразийского интеграционного пространства. Евразийский интеграционный проект: цивилизационная идентичность и глобальное позиционирование. Материалы Международного Байкальского форума / под научной редакцией Е. Р. Метелевой. Иркутск. 2018. С. 30-40.
Зевин Л. З. Мегарегионы в глобализирующемся хозяйстве // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2016. Т. 60. № 8. С. 26-33.
Лисоволик Я. Д. БРИКС-плюс: альтернативная глобализация? // Валдайские записки. Июль, 2017. № 69. С. 3-11.
Мазырин В. М. Потенциал и проблемы развития отношений между Вьетнамом и РФ (Обзор материалов круглого стола в ИДВ РАН 30 августа 2018 г.) // Вьетнамские исследования. Серия 2. 2018. № 3. С. 83-90. DOI: 10.24411/2618-9453-2018-00009
Федоров Н. В. Соглашение о зоне свободной торговли между ЕАЭС и Вьетнамом как фактор российско-вьетнамских отношений // Сравнительная политика. 2018. Т. 9. № 1. С. 74-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2018-00006
Юн С. М. Проект создания зоны свободной торговли между Евразийским экономическим союзом и Республикой Корея // Вестник Томского государственного университета. История. 2018. № 56. С. 87-90. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/56/10
Adarov A., Ghodsi M. The Impact of the Eurasian Economic Union - Iran Preferential Trade Agreement on Mutual Trade at Aggregate and Sectoral Levels. Eurasian Economic Review. 2021. No. 11. P. 125-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-020-00161-2
Bayramov V., Breban D., Mukhtarov E. Economic Effects Estimation for the Eurasian Economic Union: Application of Regional Linear Regression // Communist and Post-Communist Studies. 2019. Vol. 52. No. 3. P. 209-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2019.07.001
Dragneva R. The Eurasian Economic Union: Putin's Geopolitical Project (FPRI Research paper). Foreign Policy Research Institute. 2018. URL: https://www.fpri.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/rpe-6-dragneva-final2.pdf (дата обращения: 31.05.2021).
Dragneva R., Hartwell C. A. The Eurasian Economic Union: Integration without Liberalisation? // Post-Communist Economies. 2020. Vol. 33. No. 1. P. 200-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2020.1793586
Gast A.-S. The Eurasian Economic Union - Keeping up with the EU and China // Post-Communist Economies. 2020. Vol. 33. No. 2-3. P. 175-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2020.1827200
Golam M., Monowar M. Eurasian Economic Union: Evolution, Challenges and Possible Future Directions. Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2018. Vol. 9. No. 2. P. 163-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2018.05.001
Gorbunova M. L., Komarov I. D. Emerging Integration Projects in Eurasia: A Search for New Cooperation Formats? // Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies. 2017. Vol. 15. No. 3. P. 229-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2017.1346924
Hattori M. The Role of the Eurasian Economic Union in Trade and Industrial Policy of Russia. Russian and East European Studies. 2016. No. 45. P. 135-155. https://doi.org/10.5823/jarees.2016.135
Kirkham K. The Formation of the Eurasian Economic Union: How Successful is the Russian Regional Hegemony? // Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2016. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2015.06.002
Knobel A., Lipin A., Turdyeva N.Deep Integration in the Eurasian Economic Union: What Are the Benefits of Successful Implementation or Wider Liberalisation? // Eurasian Geography and Economics. 2019. Vol. 60. No. 2. P. 177-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2019.1627232
Krapohl S. Games Regional Actors Play: Dependency, Regionalism, and Integration Theory for the Global South // Journal of International Relations and Development. 2019. Vol. 23. No. 4. P. 840-870. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-019-00178-4
Libman A. Russian Power Politics and the Eurasian Economic Union: The Real and the Imagined // Rising Powers Quarterly. 2017. Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 81-103.
Lissovolik Y., Vinokurov E. Extending BRICS to BRICS+: The Potential for Development Finance, Connectivity and Financial Stability // Area Development and Policy. 2019. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 117-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2018.1535246
Pieper M. The linchpin of Eurasia: Kazakhstan and the Eurasian Economic Union between Russia's Defensive Regionalism and China's New Silk Roads // International Politics. 2020. No. 58. P. 462-482. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00244-6
Sergi B. S. Putin's and Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union: A Hybrid Half-Economics and Half-Political "Janus Bifrons" // Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2018. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2017.12.005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN KVIZSW
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)