The Concept of “Developmental State” in the Context of Eurasian Integration

Authors

  • U.B. Kudaiarov Eurasian Economic Commission , Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO) Автор
  • A.M. Matazimov Eurasian Economic Commission , Diplomatic Academy MFA KR named after K. Dikambaev Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2022-01-18-27

Keywords:

concept of the "developmental statе", intermediate institutions, statism, social contract, state capitalism

Abstract

Since the economic crisis of 2008, and more recently with the COVID-19 pandemic, we have seen an active involvement of the state in economic recovery. Consequently, there is growing interest in analyzing the degree of government involvement in economic development and market regulation, as well as in reviving the “developmental state” (DS) approach, in particular.Aim. To update the concept of the “developmental state” in the light of the new circumstances inherent in the 21st century. This step will allow us to take a fresh look at the model and determine the main trends of its development.Tasks. We seek to outline the classical version of the “DS” concept proposed by Ch. Johnson, to present the challenges faced by the states, to correlate the classical version with the new “possible” version of the “DS” concept, to analyze the relevance of the model in relation to the development of the EAEU.Methods. We use the systematic approach and general scientific methods of retrospective, comparative analysis, induction and deduction, generalization, grouping of information.Results. We present several bases that may become the impetus for the model transformation.Conclusion. The “21st century developmental state” must retain the bureaucratic capacity, “embedded autonomy” and now assume greater social responsibility. Human capacity, empowerment and digitalization of state functioning will be fundamental elements of a new developmental state model. The EAEU has all the possibilities to apply the model at the supranational level. Its implementation depends on the readiness of the countries for such a transformation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Глазьев C. Ю. Государство Развития// ГлазьевРу. URL: https://vk.cc/cbpKEz (дата обращения: 13.02.2022).

Завьялова Е. Б., Чжэ Сун Ли, Шаманина Э. А. Роль государственно-частного партнерства в инфраструктурном развитии: сравнительный анализ российского, китайского и корейского опыта // Сегодня и завтра российской экономики. 2019. № 95-96. С. 104-119.

Зудин А. Ю. Государство и бизнес в России: эволюция модели взаимоотношений // Неприкосновенный запас. 2006. № 6 (50). С. 200-212.

Кундин А. В. Новый тип организации государства: рациократия// Электронный периодический рецензируемый научный журнал SCI-ARTICLE.RU. 2020. № 84. С. 66-82. URL: https://vk.cc/cbpKHJ (дата обращения: 11.02.2022).

Полтерович В. М. Институты догоняющего развития (к проекту новой модели экономического развития России) // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. 2016. № 5 (47).

Babic M., J. Garcia-Bernardo, E. M. Heemskerk. The rise of transnational state capital: State-led foreign investment in the 21st century // Review of International Political Economy. 2020. V. 27. No. 3. P. 433- 475.

Beeson M. Regionalism and Globalization in East Asia: Politics, Security and Economic Development. 2014. 2nd Edition. Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan. 304 p.

Booth D. Towards a relevant concept of development regime. Developmental regimes in Africa: Synthesis Report. Overseas Development Institute. London. 2015. P. 31-34.

Evans P. B. Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton University Press. 1995. 323 p.

Evans P., Heller P. The state and development. WIDER Working Paper 2018/112. Helsinki: UNU-WIDER. 2018. URL: https://vk.cc/ccSEnU (accessed: 15.02.2022).

Fosu A. K. (ed.). Development success: Historical accounts from more advanced countries. Oxford University Press. 2013. URL: https://vk.cc/cbpKTO (accessed: 18.02.2022).

Haggard S. Developmental states. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

Hirschman A. O. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Further Reflections and a Survey of Recent Contributio ns // The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society. 1980. V. 58. No. 3. P. 430-453.

IMF. Chapter 3 State-owned enterprises: The other government. In Fiscal monitor, ed. IMF. Washington, DC: IMF. 2020. URL: https://vk.cc/cbpKWg (accessed: 14.02.2022).

Johnson C. MITI and the Japanese miracle. The growth of industrial policy, 1925-75. Stanford University Press. 1982. 412 p.

Pempel T. J. The developmental regime in a changing world economy // The Developmental state / ed. by M. Woo-Cumings. Cornell University Press. 1999. P. 137-181.

Pereira L. C. B. From Old to New Developmentalism in Latin America/ Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola de Economia de São Paulo. 2009. URL: https://vk.cc/cbpL26 (accessed: 16.02.2022).

Robinson J. A., Acemoglu D. The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty. New York: Penguin Publishers. 2019. 576 p.

Sen A. Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press. 1999. 336 p.

Szanyi M., Gerőcs T. (eds.). Market liberalism and economic patriotism in capitalist world-system. Palgrave Macmillan. 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-05186-0

Wade R. H. The developmental state: Dead or alive? // Development and Change. 2018. V. 49. Issue 2. P. 518-546.

Weiss L. The Myth of the Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity Press. 1998.

Williams M. (ed.) The end of the developmental state? New York: Routledge. 2014. 258 p.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kudaiarov U., Matazimov A. The Concept of “Developmental State” in the Context of Eurasian Integration // Eurasian Integration. 2022. no. 2. P. 18–27. https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2022-01-18-27

Коды статьи

  • EDN PLRLXD
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)