Conceptualizing Parliamentary Diplomacy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2024-03-112-121

Keywords:

parliamentary diplomacy, inter-parliamentary institutions, soft power, public diplomacy, conference diplomacy, paradiplomacy

Abstract

Aim. The article reveals the conceptual foundations of parliamentary diplomacy.Methods. In order to fulfill the purpose, the author drew upon theoretical methodology namely modelling, chronological, comparative, complementary and parallel approaches.Results. The phases of development of parliamentary diplomacy are outlined. The theoretical model (institutional design) of parliamentary diplomacy is designed. The features of the international activities of representative authorities are outlined.Conclusions. First, the geopolitical processes of the second half of the 20th century have caused parliamentary diplomacy to transform into double legitimate diplomacy, a new form of soft power tool and independent holistic concept. Second, parliamentary diplomacy has acquired a complex body (model), including various dimensions, levels of institutionalization, tools, forms and formats of cooperation. Third, although parliamentary diplomacy has a number of advantages over cabinet diplomacy (greater flexibility, informality and less bias), the other side of its institutional features (reduced powers, limited resources and ideological colouring) may have a negative impact on applied outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • L.A. Savelchev, Baltic State Technical University “VOENMEH” named after D. F. Ustinov

    Leonid A. Savelchev, PhD student at the Department of International Industrial Management and Communication

    Saint Petersburg

References

Баранов Н. А. Мировая политика в условиях геополитической неопределенности: тренды и перспективы // Политическая экспертиза: ПОЛИТЭКС. 2024. T. 19. № 3. С. 486–504. DOI: 10.21638/spbu23.2023.309

Варлен М. В. О возрастающей роли парламентской дипломатии в многополярном мире // Lex russica (Русский закон). 2019. № 7. C. 55. DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2019.152.7.054-065

Вода К. Форматы, особенности, перспективы парламентской дипломатии России в АТР // Федерализм. 2019. № 3. С. 116–131. DOI: 10.21686/2073-1051-2019-3-116-131

Дроздовская Ю. В. Парламентская дипломатия Санкт-Петербурга в регионе Балтийского моря (на примере Парламентской Конференции Балтийского Моря) // Успехи современной науки и образования. 2017. Т. 6. № 4. С. 129–133.

Еремина Н. В. Парадипломатия: новый голос регионов в современном дипломатическом концерте? (на примере Шотландии и Уэльса) // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2012. № 6. С. 42–51. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2012-6-42-51

Колыхалов М. И. Анализ и классификация основных факторов, определяющих современные международные связи регионов государств // Регионология. 2019. Т. 27. № 2. С. 270–289. DOI: 10.15507/2413-1407.106.027.201902.270-289

Коньков А. Е., Чуков Р. С. Парламентская дипломатия: развитие общественно-государственного взаимодействия на мегаполитическом уровне // Полис. Политические исследования. 2020. № 1. С. 62–73. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.01.05

Косов Ю. В., Торопыгин А. В. Содружество Независимых Государств: Интеграция, парламентская дипломатия и конфликты : учебник. М. : Аспект Пресс, 2012. 296 с.

Современная мировая политика: учебник / С. C. Жильцов, М. А. Неймарк, О. Г. Карпович. Дип. акад. МИД России. М. : Проспект, 2023. 600 с.

Browne M. Para-Diplomacy by Provincial Legislatures: How Turkey and Caribou Make the Case // Canadian Parliamentary Review. 2021. Vol. 44. No. 1. P. 9–14. URL: http://www.revparlcan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/44n1e_21whole. pdf (дата обращения: 05.03.2024).

Cutler R. The OSCE’s Parliamentary Diplomacy in Central Asia and the South Caucasus in Comparative Perspective // Studia Diplomatica. 2006. Vol. LIX. No. 2. P. 79–93. URL: http://old.agora-parl.org/sites/default/files/ar06sdip.pdf (дата обращения: 05.03.2024).

Elmore J. The Future Development of the United Nations: Some Suggestions for Research // The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1961. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 119–127. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/172781 (дата обращения: 05.03.2024).

Fonck D. Parliamentary Diplomacy and Legislative-Executive Relations in EU Foreign Policy: Studying the European Parliament’s Mediation of the Macedonian Political Crisis (2015–17) // Journal of Common Market Studies. 2018. Vol. 56. No. 6. P. 1305–1322.

Global Diplomacy: An Introduction to Theory and Practice / ed. by Balzacq T., Charillon F., Ramel F. The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. 2020. 344 p. DOI: 10.1007/978- 3-030-28786-3_12

Jaskiernia J. Parliamentary Diplomacy — A New Dimension of Contemporary Parliamentarism // Studia Iuridica Lublinensia. 2022. Vol. 31. No. 5. P. 85–101. DOI: 10.17951/sil.2022.31.5.85-101

Jessup P. Parliamentary Diplomacy: An Examination of the Legal Quality of the Rules of Procedure of Organs of the United Nations // In Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. 1956. Vol. 89. No. 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_A9789028612624_03

Majidi M. Parliamentary Diplomacy: Its Evolution and Role in International Relations // Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs. 2021. Vol. 12. No. 34. P. 306–329. DOI: 10.22034/irfa.2021.162036

Nye J. Soft Power the Means to Success in World Politics. New York : Public Affair, 2004. 209 p.

Nye J., Keohane R. Power and Interdependence, Scott, Foresman., 2nd ed. 1989. 315 p.

Parliamentary Dimensions of Regionalization and Globalization: The Role of Inter-Parliamentary Institutions / ed. by Costa O., Dri C., Stavridis S. Palgrave Macmillan, London. 2013. 286 p. DOI: 10.1057/9781137322746

Sergunin A. Russian Sub-National Actors: Paradiplomacies in the Arctic Region // ERSA Conference Papers. European Regional Science Association. 2014. P. 1–21. URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa14/ e140826aFinal01759.pdf (дата обращения: 05.03.2024).

Stavridis S. Parliamentary Diplomacy: A Review Article // International Journal of Parliamentary Studies. 2021. Vol. 1. No. 2. P. 227–269. DOI: 10.1163/26668912-bja10027

Stavridis S., Jancic D. Parliamentary Diplomacy in European and Global Governance. Diplomatic Studies. Leiden : Brill Nijhoff, 2017. 393 p.

Thompson K. The New Diplomacy and the Quest for Peace // International Organization. 1965. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 394– 409. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2705861 (дата обращения: 05.03.2024).

Downloads

Published

2024-05-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Savelchev L. Conceptualizing Parliamentary Diplomacy // Eurasian Integration. 2024. Vol. 18, no. 3. P. 112–121. https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2024-03-112-121

Коды статьи

  • EDN WVSKJM
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)