Comparative Analysis of South Korean and American Soft Power Practices in World Politics

Authors

  • E.K. Belaia St. Petersburg State University Автор
  • M.A. Kashina Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA) Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2022-04-106-120

Keywords:

south Korea, usa, korean wave, hallyu, confucianism, cultural diplomacy, popular culture, social networks, fandom

Abstract

In the 21st century, soft power has proved its effectiveness and expediency and has become one of the most important foreign policy instruments of strong, medium and small powers. The approach proposed by Joseph Nye is considered to be a classic example of soft power politics with the United States being the leading state in this field. However, considering the intensification of glocalization processes and the growth of anti-global and anti-American sentiments, the effectiveness of the US soft power is being called into question. On the contrary, the popularity of South Korean culture has been constantly growing all over the world in recent years, which proves the possibility of successful application of the soft power policy by a non-Western (Asian) state.Aim. The aim is to compare the South Korean and American approaches to the implementation of soft power policy.Tasks. The tasks include studying the elements of the US and South Korean soft power models (culture and way of life, values and ideologies, principles of foreign and domestic policy) and comparing them with each other.Methods. The methods of cross-cultural analysis and secondary analysis of data, including official sources, were used.Results. When implementing the soft power policy, both states use the same resources (elements) distinguished by Joseph Nye (culture and lifestyle, ideology and values, principles of domestic and foreign policy).Conclusion. The difference between national models of soft power lies in the content of these elements. The United States and the Republic of Korea convey different values and prioritize different elements of soft power. The United States, placing the main emphasis on ideology, promotes democratic values, while the Republic of Korea, relying on culture in the broadest sense, appeals to humanistic and Confucian values (love for oneself, caring for others, seeking harmony, cheerfulness). Directions for further research include the analysis of the origins and prospects of such a phenomenon of international relations as Asian waves (Japanese, Korean, Chinese, etc.).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Андреев И. А. "Мягкая сила" на Западе и на Востоке: проблема эффективности // Власть. 2021. Том. 29. № 4. С. 102-108.

Богатуров А. Д. Истоки американского поведения // Россия в глобальной политике. 2004. № 6. С. 80-97.

Бураев Д. И., Гармаханов М. Ц. Корейская волна и мягкая сила. Стратегия развития и распространения // Вестник Бурятского государственного университета. 2014. № 8. С. 115-120.

Емельянова Н. Н. "Мягкая сила" как концепт: критический анализ // Международная аналитика. 2018. № 3 (25). С. 7-24.

Киссинджер Г. Дипломатия. М.: Ладомир, 1997. 848 с.

Кузина Л. Б., Кузина Н. В. Влияние современных социокультурных практик стран Азиатско-Тихоокеанского региона на эстетические предпочтения, ценностные и поведенческие стереотипы подростков и юношества Российской Федерации (популярная музыка, мультипликация, самодеятельная литература, повседневность) // Modern Studies of Social Issues. 2020. Т. 12. С. 137-194.

Курбанов С. О. История Кореи: с древности до начала XXI в. СПб.: Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та, 2009. 680 с.

Лысак И. В. Проблема сохранения культурной идентичности в условиях глобализации // Гуманитарные и социально-экономические науки. 2010. № 4 (53). С. 99-103.

Люттвак Э. Государственный переворот: практическое пособие. М.: РФСОиН. 2012. 326 с.

Малиновский А. С. Культурная глобализация (глокализация). Локальное и транснациональное // Вестник Томского государственного педагогического университета. 2013. № 1 (129). С. 176-179.

Матвеенко Ю. И., Галаева М. Г. Стратегия "Мягкой силы" основных акторов международных отношений // Проблемы постсоветского пространства. 2016. С. 69-79.

Пионткевич Л. Ю. Феномен власти: проблема концептуализации // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2008. С. 41-48.

Подосокорский Н. Н. Мягкая сила ТикТока: соцсеть, которая покорила мир // Наука телевидения. 2022. № 18 (2). С. 117-146.

Радиков И., Лексютина Я. "Мягкая сила" как современный атрибут великой державы // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2012. № 2. C. 19-26.

Сенокоп Я. С. Упадок "мягкой силы" во внешней политике США: причины и тенденции // Социально-гуманитарные знания. 2021. С. 303-312.

Федотова В. Г. Единство и многообразие культур в условиях глобализации // Вопросы философии. 2011. № 9. С. 45-53.

Хантингтон С. Столкновение цивилизаций / пер. с англ. Т. Велимеева, Ю. Новикова. М.: Издательство АСТ. 2003. 603 с.

Chang Hyunguen. The Changeover of Korean Concept toward China: Sinocentrism, Small-Sinocentrism, and Post-Sinocentrism // Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies. 2011. Vol. 18. № 2. P. 97-123. (In Kor.)

Cho Byung Chul, Sim Hichul. Sucess Factor Analysis of K-POP and a Study on Sustainable Korean Wave - Focus on Smart Media based on Realistic Contents // The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2013. № 13 (5). P. 90-102. (In Kor.)

Huang Yihang. Analysis on South Korean Soft Power - Taking BTS, Parasite and Squid Game as Examples // Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. 2022. Vol. 663. P. 80-84.

Jang Wonho, Song Jung Eun. Analysis of the Non-economic Value of Hallyu: Focusing on Empathic Communication between BTS and ARMY // A Study on the Ripple Effect of Hallyu. Korea International Cultural Exchange Agency. 2018. P. 89-214. (In Kor.)

Kim Bok Rae. Past, Present and Future of Hallyu (Korean Wave) // American International Journal of Contemporary Research. 2015. Vol. 5. № 5. P. 154-160.

Kim Ki-Duk, Bae Sang-Joon. Hallyu and the Traditional Cultural Genes of Korea // Kritika Kultura. 2017. Vol. 29. P. 318-339.

Lee Dong Bae. A Study on Storytelling of Cultural Contents in the Global Age // Cultural Content Research. 2019. Vol. 17. P. 69-93. (In Kor.)

Nye Joseph S. Bound to Lead: the Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books. 1990.

Nye Joseph S. Soft Power: The Evolution of a Concept // Journal of Political Power. 2021. P. 1-13.

Park Hyun-Kyu. Success Factor Analysis of New Korean Wave ‘K-POP' and a Study on the Importance of Smart Media to Sustain Korean Wave // Journal of Digital Convergence. 2020. Vol. 18. № 4. P. 129-135.

Yufei Wang. Exploring the Realization of the American Dream - Taking the Pursuit of Happiness as an Example // Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. 2020. Vol. 445. P. 32-36.

김상배. 소프트 파워와 21세기 권력. 네트워크 권력론의 모색. 한울아카데미. 2009. 344쪽 (Ким Санбэ. Мягкая сила и власть в XXI веке. Изучение теории сетевой власти. Академия Хануль. 2009. 344 с). (In Kor.)

Downloads

Published

2022-07-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Belaia E., Kashina M. Comparative Analysis of South Korean and American Soft Power Practices in World Politics // Eurasian Integration. 2022. no. 4. P. 106–120. https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2022-04-106-120

Коды статьи

  • EDN QGSFZZ
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)