Maritime Communications in the Spatial Organization of the Arctic Version of the “Great Game”

Authors

  • S. Yu. Kozmenko ФИЦ «Кольский научный центр РАН» Автор

Keywords:

Индо-Пацифика, the “Great Game”, the MAGA concept, the “Make Russia Great Again” initiative, Greater Eurasia, Indo-Pacifica

Abstract

The article analyzes the role and importance of maritime communications in the spatial organization of the Arctic version of the “Great Game”, the main actors of which are Russia, China and the United States. The “Great Game” is also reaching a new level. If in the 19th century the parties to the confrontation were the great powers of the maritime and continental nature, having significant experience of imperial development, now the intercontinental (America — Eurasia) Arctic version of the “Great Game” is unfolding before our eyes along the meridian axis of the interface of the two hemispheres. The basis of this version is to achieve control over Arctic maritime communications in order to organize the most rational supply chains along the America — Asia line. Aim. Substantiation of Russia’s positioning in the contours of the strategic initiative “Let’s Make Russia Great Again” on the margins of the modern version of the “Great Game” in the new geopolitical conditions of the development of the MAGA (Make America Great Again) concept and the decline of the global ultra-liberal world order based on “rules”. Tasks. To determine the lines of probable intercontinental (America and Eurasia) confrontation on the Arctic sea communications along the meridian of the interface of the two hemispheres. To clarify and regulate the possibilities of coordinating military, political and economic activities in the Arctic. Methods. Strategic planning combined with the tools of spatial economics and the Western version of the latter, known as the theory of “new economic geography”. This makes it possible to substantiate the importance of maritime communications in the modern version of the “Great Game” and in the dynamics of the prospective development of the Russian Arctic. Conclusions. Against the background of the implementation of the MAGA concept in the western hemisphere, favorable conditions are being created in the fields of the modern (Arctic) version of the “Great Game” for the development of the strategic initiative “Let’s Make Russia Great Again” in the eastern hemisphere. This wi ll contribute to its guaranteed access to the North Atlantic from the Black Sea and Baltic directions, as well as strengthen its position in Northern Eurasia and the northern segment of the Indo-Pacific.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ивашов Л. Г. Геополитика русской цивилизации. Москва : Институт русской цивилизации, 2015. 800 с. EDN: XDCIJT

Кефели И. Ф., Абылгазиев И. И., Ильин И. В. [и др.] Глобальная геополитика : монография. 2-е изд. Москва : Изд-во МГУ. 2017. 280 с. ISBN: 978-5-19-011221-4.

Кефели И. Ф., Малафеев О. А. Математические начала глобальной геополитики. Санкт-Петербург : Изд-во Политехн. ун-та, 2013. 204 с. ISBN: 978-5-7422-4098-3. EDN: SJHSFH

Козьменко С. Ю. Морские и континентальные контуры геополитического статуса современной России // Евразийская интеграция: экономика, право, политика. 2025. Т. 19. № 2 (52). С. 23–32. EDN: SCQHHQ

Козьменко С. Ю., Козьменко А. С. Новые условия развития «Большой игры» в Арктике и приоритеты актуальной концепции внешней политики России // Евразийская интеграция: экономика, право, политика. 2023. Т. 17, № 4 (46). С. 52–61. EDN: MXZXOB. DOI: 10.22394/2073-2929-2023-04-52-61

Козьменко С. Ю., Козьменко А. С. Планирование развития арктических морских коммуникаций в эпоху гибридной войны // Арктика и Север. 2025. № 59. С. 44–62. EDN: TAAHMS. DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2025.59.44

Козьменко С. Ю., Козьменко А. С. Планирование экономического присутствия России в Арктике // Север и рынок: формирование экономического порядка. 2024. Т. 27, № 2 (84). С. 146–157. EDN: YPLFCB. DOI: 10.37614/2220-802X.2.2024.84.011

Коломб Ф. Морская война, ее основные принципы и опыт / рус. пер. Н. П. Азбелева. Москва, Санкт-Петербург : Terra Fantastica. 2003. 668 с. ISBN: 5-17-016752-0.

Мэхэн А. Т. Влияние морской силы на французскую революцию и Империю / пер. Н. Л. Кладо, в 2-х томах. Москва, Санкт-Петербург : Terra Fantastica. 2002.

Стрельникова И. А., Майоров М.Г., Попов Д. И. Расширение БРИКС: последствия для арктического сотрудничества в сфере логистики // Анализ и прогноз. 2024. № 3. C. 71–82. EDN: FGFWBI. DOI: 10.20542/afij-2024-3-71-82

Mackinder H. J. Democratic Ideals and Reality. New York : Henry Holt and Co., 1942. (First published in 1919). National Defense University Press Publications, Washington, DC, 1996. 213 p.

Mackinder H. J. The Geographical Pivot of History // The Geographical Journal. 1904. Vol. 23, No. 4 (Apr., 1904). P. 298–321. DOI: 10.2307/1775498

Mackinder H. J. The Round World and the Winning of Peace // Foreign Affairs. Vol. 21, No. 4 (Jul., 1943). P. 595–605. DOI: 10.2307/20029780

Mahan A. T. The Influence of sea Power upon History 1660–1783. Boston : Little, Brown, and Company. 1890 / пер. Н. П. Азбелева. Мэхэн А. Т. Влияние морской силы на историю. Москва, Санкт-Петербург : Terra Fantastica. 2002. 636 с.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kozmenko S.Y. Maritime Communications in the Spatial Organization of the Arctic Version of the “Great Game” // Eurasian Integration. 2026. Vol. 20, no. 2. P. 58–67.