Rethinking the Soviet Legacy: A New Energy Paradigm for the Industrial Development Model of the Donetsk People’s Republic
Keywords:
социально-экономическое развитие, Soviet regional development school, industrial transformation, interregional cooperation, spatial development, macroregion, human capital, socio-economic developmentAbstract
It is substantiated that the socio-economic development of the Donetsk People’s Republic cannot be reduced to the mechanical restoration of lost industrial capacities and requires a qualitative transformation of the region’s production and economic model. The current economic structure of the region is shown to be the result of a long-term evolutionary trajectory, including the Soviet period of forming an integrated territorial production complex, the subsequent degradation of production chains during the period when the region was part of Ukraine, and fragmented recovery attempts under conditions of institutional instability and economic constraints in 2014–2022. It is demonstrated that the methodological legacy of the Soviet school of territorial planning (I. G. Alexandrov, N. N. Kolosovsky, N. N. Baransky) retains significant heuristic potential for interpreting contemporary processes of industrial development and for designing a new model of regional growth. Aim. The aim of the paper is to substantiate the directions for transforming the socio-economic model of the Donetsk People’s Republic on the basis of methodological continuity with the Soviet school of regional development. Methods. The methods employed include retrospective analysis of the region’s socio-economic development, comparative analysis of industrial organization models across different historical periods, an evolutionary approach to studying transformations of the production structure, structural- functional analysis of territorial production systems, and elements of institutional analysis of factors and barriers to regional development. The theoretical framework is based on the concepts of territorial production complexes, energy-production cycles, and spatial organization of the economy developed by I. G. Alexandrov, N. N. Kolosovsky, and N. N. Baransky. Results. The results reveal a key regularity in the degradation of the region’s economic structure, manifested in the consistent weakening of internal production chains and the increasing dominance of raw-material specialization from the Soviet period to the present. A concept of a shift in the development energy paradigm is proposed, involving a transition from the dominance of fossil fuel energy to the “energy of knowledge”, “energy of data”, and “energy of cooperation” as system-forming factors of industrial transformation. A model of the macroregional territorial production complex “Donbass-Crimea” is proposed, based on functional division of labor between the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics, Rostov Region, and Crimea. Principles of evolutionary transformation of industrial specialization are formulated, including vertical integration of production chains, horizontal diversification of competencies, and functional rethinking of the role of coal in the regional economy. Conclusions. The conclusions substantiate that sustainable socio-economic development of the Donetsk People’s Republic requires methodological continuity with the Soviet school of territorial planning, a shift in the energy paradigm, prioritization of human capital reproduction, and macroregional integration, combined with an evolutionary character of transformation of the production and economic model.Downloads
References
Александров И. Г. Основы хозяйственного районирования СССР. М.-Л. : Экономическая жизнь, 1924. 76 с.
Александров И. Г. Экономическое районирование России, Госплан. М. : III Интернационал, 1921. 15 с.
Амоша А. И., Булеев И. П., Вишневский В. П. [и др.] Оценка состояния экономики Донецкой области и обоснование путей выхода ее из кризиса 2013–2014 гг. : науч.-аналит. записка / под общ. ред. И. П. Булеева; НАН Украины, Ин-т экономики пром-сти. Киев, 2015. 128 с.
Баранский Н. Н. Становление советской экономической географии : избранные труды. М. : Мысль , 1980. 287 с.
Баранский Н. Н. Экономическая география СССР: Обзор по областям Госплана. 3-е изд., стер. Москва ; Ленинград : Гос. изд-во, 1927. 336 с.
Баранский Н. Н., Преображенский А. И. Экономическая картог рафия : учеб. пособие для ун-тов. М. : Географгиз, 1962. 286 с. EDN: ZAQVVB
К олосовский Н. Н. Избранные труды. Смоленск : Изд-во Ойкумена, 2006. 334 с.
Колосовский Н. Н. Основы экономического районирования. М. : Госполитиздат, 1958. 200 с. EDN: VPDVTP
Колосовский Н. Н. Теория экономического районирования. М. : Мысль, 1969. 336 с. EDN: TLAWLO
Котов Е. В. Перспективы неоиндустриализации экономики частично признанного государства // Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета. Серия: Политические, социологические и экономические науки. 2022. Т. 7, № 2. С. 243–254. EDN: QTSAGS. DOI: 10.21603/2500-3372-2022-7-2-243-254
Сальников В. И., Котов Е. В. Особенности политического транзита на постсоветском пространстве (на примере ПМР и ДНР) // Евразийская интеграция: экономика, право, политика. 2022. Т. 16, № 2. С. 95–106. EDN: OYVIHI. DOI: 10.22394/2073-2929-2022-02-95-106
Capello R., Nijkamp P. (eds.) Handbook of Regional Growth and Development Theories. Cheltenham, Northampton : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009. 529 p. ISBN: 978-1-84720-506-3.
Guowu L., Bai G. Globalization and Domestic Coping Strategies: The Development of China’s Industrial Clusters // İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi. 2020. No. 40 (2). Р. 625–647. DOI: 10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0057
McCann P., Van Oort F. Theories of Agglomeration and Regional Economic Growth: A Historical Review // Handbook of Regional Growth and Development Theories / ed. by R. Capello, P. Nijkamp. Cheltenham, Northampton : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009. P. 19–32. DOI: 10.4337/9781788970020.00007
Nijkamp P., Abreu M. Regional Development Theory // International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Elsevier, 2009. P. 202–207. DOI: 10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00869-5