Interpretation of Values in the Conceptual and Strategic Documents of the EAEU Countries: The Factor of Global Turbulence

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2023-04-102-111

Keywords:

axiological aspect, foreign policy, eurasian integration, challenges and threats, spiritual and moral values, national security, traditional values, patriotism

Abstract

In a situation of growing international confrontation, it is important to clearly identify tools and mechanisms that can contribute to the consolidation of the positions of states friendly to Russia. In the context of one of the lines of global fragmentation - the division of the world into the West and non-West - the deepening and expansion of the Eurasian integration agenda is actualized.Aim . To determine the specifics of the interpretation of values in the conceptual and strategic documents of the EAEU countries in the context of their adaptation to the current challenges and threats of national and international security, integration dynamics and changes in the external environment in the conditions of global turbulence.Task . To characterize the axiological aspect of the existing conceptual and strategic documents of the EAEU countries; to identify key concepts that reveal the concept of values in them; to show common and distinctive features in the approaches of the EAEU countries in this area and the possibilities of their convergence at the integration level.Methods. The study was based on comparative analysis and non-formalized qualitative analysis of documents.Results. The main semantic blocks in the content of the conceptual and strategic documents of the EAEU countries are highlighted, taking into account the designated problem field. The focus of attention was on the interpretation of external challenges and threats, manifestations of global turbulence; articulation of certain values in a changing extern al environment; linking with the ethno-cultural component and identity issues. A significant coupling of approaches to the interpretation of values with the influence of external factors has been established. The specificity of verification of sources and directions of destructive influence is shown.Conclusions. The approaches of the EAEU countries to the interpretation of values in the perspective of events and processes taking place in the external dimension have a large number of coincidences and common features. The central concept in the studied documents is spiritual and moral values, the preservation and protection of which are embedded in the system of national interests / national strategic priorities. In the external dimension, international humanitarian cooperation is emphasized, which is conceived as a way of inter-civilizational dialogue against the background of increasing instability and conflict. A serious vulnerability can be considered the absence of an explicit interface between the value agenda formed by each of the countries of the Union and their integration guidelines and preferences.

Agencies

Исследование выполнено за счет гранта Российского научного фонда № 23-28-00371, https://rscf.ru/project/23-28-00371/

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • O.V. Bakhlova, National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University

    Olga V. Bakhlova , Professor of Department of General History, Political Science and Area Studies, Doctor of Science (Political Science), Associate Professor

    Saransk

  • I.V. Bakhlov, National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University

    Igor V. Bakhlov, Head of Department of General History, Political Science and Area Studies, Doctor of Science (Political Science), Associate Professor

    Saransk

References

Ватыль В. Н. Защита государственного суверенитета в Республике Беларусь: противодействие деструктивным угрозам в политической сфере // Вестник Гродненского государственного университета им. Янки Купалы. Серия 1. История и археология. Философия. Политология. 2023. Т. 15. № 1. С. 123–128.

Вивьер В. Н. Освещение евразийской интеграции в американском научно-академическом дискурсе // Вестник международных организаций. 2020. Т. 15. № 3. С. 307–327. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2020-03-12

Глазьев C. Ю., Кефели И. Ф. К вопросу об идеологии Евразийского экономического союза // Евразийская интеграция: экономика, право, политика. 2022. № 1 (39). С. 10–21. DOI: 10.22394/2073-2929-2022-01-10-21

Кабазиев М. Ш. Формирование национальной идентичности Республики Казахстан: особенности и противоречия // Современная Европа. 2022. № 7 (114). С. 221–231. DOI: 10.31857/S020170832207018X

Кефели И. Ф. Евразийская цивилизация: от идеи к современному дискурсу // Евразийская интеграция: экономика, право, политика. 2021. № 2 (36). С. 12–25. DOI: 10.22394/2073-2929-2021-02-12-25

Осадчая Г. И. Евразийская интеграция: принципы, идеология, практика // Журнал Белорусского государственного университета. Социология. 2020. № 1. С. 31–43.

Полулях Д. С. Турбулентность как характеристика современного миропорядка // Политическая наука. 2017. № S. С. 245–260.

Старичёнок В. В. Ценности белорусов в разрезе идеологии // Научные труды Республиканского института высшей школы. Философско-гуманитарные науки. 2019. № 18. С. 264–271. EDN: CPCDEJ

Шамахов В. А. Социальное и гуманитарное сотрудничество: опыт и перспективы // Евразийская интеграция: экономика, право, политика. 2020. № 1 (31). С. 31–35. DOI: 10.22394/2073-2929-2020-1-31-35

Яковлев А. А. Евразийский экономический союз и китайская инициатива «Один пояс — один путь». Возможности для сотрудничества // Вестник Института экономики Российской академии наук. 2018. № 1. С. 204–211. EDN: DRZSCM. DOI: 10.24411/2073-6487-2018-00029

Deutsch K. W. Political Community and the North American Area. Princeton : Princeton University Press. 2015. 244 p.

Etzioni A. Political Unification Revisited: on Building Supernational Communities. Lanham : Lexington Books. 2001. 412 p.

Garashchuk A. The Eurasian Economic Union in Search of Strategic Partners: the Gravity Effects of Integration Blocs // Panoeconomicus. 2023. Vol. 70. No. 1. P. 155–179. DOI: 10.2298/PAN190612008G

Luhmann N. Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt : Suhrkamp. 1984. 674 s. (На нем. яз.)

March J., Olsen J. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life // The American Political Science Review. 1984. Vol. 78. No. 3. P. 734–749.

Roedyati J. Conflict Management inside EAEU to Preserve Its Forum // Journal of Economics Management and Trade. 2022. Vol. 28. No. 11. P. 64–68. DOI: 10.9734/jemt/2022/v28i111056

Rosenau J. N. Turbulence in World Politics. A Theory of Change and Continuity. Princeton, New Jersey : Princeton University Press. 1990. 480 p.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Bakhlova O., Bakhlov I. Interpretation of Values in the Conceptual and Strategic Documents of the EAEU Countries: The Factor of Global Turbulence // Eurasian Integration. 2023. Vol. 17, no. 4. P. 102–111. https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2023-04-102-111

Коды статьи

  • EDN RQEQIT
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)