Eurasian Economic Solidarity: Justification from the Standpoint of Judicial Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2023-03-101-108Keywords:
solidarity, court, integration, publicity, constitution, identity, disputesAbstract
Aim. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the concept of Eurasian economic solidarity in the context of the practice of the court of the Eurasian Economic Union.Tasks. The objectives of the study are: highlighting the sign of publicity in the context of economic integration; analysis of existing scientific and normative approaches to solidarity; substantiation of Eurasian economic solidarity as a principle and value of economic interaction, formed, inter alia, through judicial practice.Methods. The following methods were used: institutional analysis, comparative analysis, system analysis - to substantiate the sign of publicity in the context of economic integration, to characterize the Eurasian economic solidarity as a principle and value of economic interaction within the framework of the common economic space of the EAEU, to highlight the practice of the EAEU court as a factor in the formation of the Eurasian economic solidarity. The method of formal-logical analysis was also used - in clarifying the concepts of “solidarity” and “economic solidarity”.Results. Firstly, the activity of the EAEU Court reflects international or integration normative control, which is an integral part of public control and supervision in the conditions of integration. In the context of economic integration, the sign of “publicity” in relation to control and supervision as basic management functions is naturally supplemented by an integration level. Secondly, the supranational bodies of the EAEU, including the Court of the EAEU, are able to form and ensure economic solidarity in the context of Eurasian integration. Thirdly, Eurasian economic solidarity is seen as the principle and value of economic interaction within the framework of a single economic territory.Conclusions. Eurasian economic solidarity is based on economic unity, but is not conditioned by it. It is formed in the processes of integration rule-making and law enforcement. Eurasian economic solidarity is closely connected with other types of solidarity: ethnic, social, etc. Dispute resolution and interpretation by the EAEU Court act as a means of forming common economic positions within the EAEU. The EAEU Court has a sufficient and not fully realized potential to influence the development of Eurasian integration, including by stimulating the development of Eurasian economic solidarity. Equal access of economic entities of the EAEU member states to justice for the protection of economic rights is a condition for Eurasian economic solidarity.Downloads
References
Агамагомедова С. А. Защита интересов бизнеса в условиях интеграции: практика Суда Евразийского экономического союза // Право и экономика. 2021. № 10 (404). С. 12–19. EDN: OMEETK
Брындин Е. Г. Международная экономическая солидарность // Репутациология. 2012. № 1–2 (17– 18). С. 22–24. EDN: OWDEQZ
Капустин А. Я. Международное судебное толкование международного договора: современные тренды // Журнал российского права. 2021. Т. 25. № 8. С. 104–117. DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2021.102; EDN: SSFQYQ
Капустин А. Я., Ковлер А. И., Белялова А. М. [и др.] Практика рассмотрения межгосударственных жалоб в международных судах: история вопроса и перспективы // Журнал зарубежного законодательства и сравнительного правоведения. 2020. № 6. С. 116–134. DOI: 10.12737/jflcl.2020.056; EDN: CSYFPD
Нешатаева Т. Н. Наднационализм: развитие внутреннего права ЕАЭС // Российское правосудие. 2019. № 5. С. 38–57. DOI: 10.17238/issn2072-909X.2019.5.38-57; EDN: WBGVCZ
Нешатаева Т. Н. Независимость и добросовестность суда и судей в цифровую эпоху: интеграционный опыт // Вестник Пермского университета. Юридические науки. 2022. № 55. C. 107–126. DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2022-55-107-126; EDN: GGVIFW
Нешатаева Т. Н. Слышать жизнь: действие актов международного суда в национальных правовых системах // Российское правосудие. 2018. № 1. С. 46–62. EDN: YVJMDB
Ориу М. Основы публичного права. Перевод с франц. М. : Издательство Коммунистической академии, 1929. 759 c.
Хопёрская Л. Л., Голованов Р. С. Евразийская стратегия межэтнического согласия (на материалах государств Центральной Азии и Юга России) // Государственное и муниципальное управление. Ученые записки. 2020. № 1. С. 172–178. DOI: 10.22394/2079-1690-2020-1-1-172-178; EDN: HFDHBS
Шлыкова Н. Б., Грачев Д. О., Чиркин В. Е. [и др.] Конституции государств Азии / под ред. Т. Я. Хабриевой. Т. 1: Западная Азия. М. : Юридическое издательство «Норма», 2010. 544 с. EDN: QLYXFZ
Ястребов О. А. Юридическое лицо публичного права: сравнительно-правовое исследование: автореф. дисс. … докт. юрид. наук. Москва, 2010. 50 c. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://viewer.rsl.ru/ru/rsl01004604255?page=2&rotate=0&theme=white (дата обращения: 06.07.2023).
Bauhr M., Charron N. Stand Together or Alone? Public Support for European Economic Solidarity during the Covid-19 Pandemic // European Societies. 2021. Vol. 23. Issue 4. P. 533–561. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2021.1922931
Heffernan T. Crisis and Belonging: Protest Voices and Empathic Solidarity in Post-Economic Collapse Iceland // Religions. 2022. Vol. 11. Issue 1. Article Number 22. DOI: 10.3390/rel11010022
Karagiannis N. Solidarity within Europe / Solidarity without Europe // European Societies. 2007. Vol. 9. Issue 1. P. 3–21. DOI: 10.1080/14616690601079416
Scipes K. Global Labor Solidarity // Working USA — the Journal of Labor and Society. 2014. Vol. 17. Issue 2. P. 141–144. DOI: 10.1111/wusa.12103
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Agamagomedova S.A.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN PRGXQG
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)